The head of damages for loss of enjoyment of life allows for compensation where the victim is unable to continue regularly engaging in a sporting or leisure activity that they practiced before the accident.
In a judgment of 26 June 2024, the First Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation held that an insurer could not refuse to compensate a victim for loss of enjoyment on the grounds that the victim was still able to practice a sport (golf), albeit less regularly and with reduced success compared to before the accident.
Accordingly, a mere limitation (rather than a complete inability) to engage in a sporting activity is sufficient to justify compensation.
Civ. 1st, 26 June 2024, No. 23-15.345